I was quoted in an LA Times article about the 9th circuit’s refusal to reinstate Trump’s travel ban. I stated the Supreme Court might find it easier to reject the travel ban based on a violation of existing law rather than constitutional grounds. “It is always hard to win an immigration case on constitutional grounds in the Supreme Court because immigration touches on foreign relations and national sovereignty issues. People outside the United States also generally don’t have U.S. constitutional rights. The combination of the two rulings provides a one-two punch against the executive order that will make it harder for the administration to win at the Supreme Court.”
President Trump’s twitter page has been a major focus of his time in office thus far, stirring up a lot of attention from the media and the public. In early June, tweets regarding his revised immigration executive order drew attention that I believe will only do harm to his defense of the “travel ban”. Quite simply, he may have shot himself in the legal foot here.
Read the full article on Time.com, here: http://time.com/4805973/travel-ban-supreme-court-donald-trump-tweets/.
I was quoted by USA Today in an article addressing the new Department of State form that asks for visa applicants’ social media account information. The effort to review social media accounts is an already existing one, however, I believe the new form will be used as a way to further delay and deny visas.
The full article can be accessed on USA Today’s website.
CNN discusses why Donald Trump’s travel ban executive order is up for another round of debate with the 9th Circuit. 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals has also been tapped to make a decision. No matter how the two courts rule, I predict this case will go to the Supreme Court; the issue is too important to pass up.
Read the whole analysis with CNN.
Trump said dangerous people might be pouring in without his travel ban. But he’s not rushing to restore it.
I spoke with the Washington Post about some of the options the Trump Administration might pursue regarding the travel ban. There might be strategic reasons to wait before appealing it, but waiting also seems counterintuitive to the stated urgency of the order. Read more with Washington Post.